STATE COURT OF BIBB COUNTY
CIVIL JURY VERDICT REPORT
PLAINTIFF: Pamela Barrett Moran, Individually and as
Administrator of the Estate of Todd Barrett
DEFENDANTS: Hugh F. Smisson, III, M.D. and The
Georgia Neurological Institute, P.A.
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 52498
JUDGE: William P. Adams
TYPE OF CASE: Wrongful
Death Medical Malpractice action arising from treatment rendered in November 2000
following surgery done on November 2, 2000.
VERDICT: Defendants
TRIAL DATE: February 18 – 22, 2008.
DAMAGES SOUGHT: $4,000,000.00.
INSURANCE CARRIER: MAG
Mutual Insurance Company
NEGOTIATION: None
PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEYS:
Eric Hertz, Houston Smith, and Adrienne Hobbs
DEFENDANTS’ATTORNEYS: John Edwards and Richard Epps
OTHER INFORMATION:
Todd
Barrett, age 39, died on November 13, 2000, following back surgery done at the Medical Center of
Central Georgia on November 2, 2000, by Dr. Smisson, a neurosurgeon. The cause of death was a blood clot which
developed after surgery and went to Mr. Barrett’s lungs. Plaintiff contended Dr. Smisson was negligent
in his failure to use the blood thinner Heparin as a prevention for the
development of blood clots. Dr. Smisson
had ordered ambulation and hoses and compression devices as a way to prevent
blood clots. The Defendant’s witnesses
testified Mr. Barrett refused to wear the hoses and compression devices. The Plaintiff’s case consisted of two expert
witnesses, one an orthopedic surgeon and the other a pulmonologist, both of
whom testified Dr. Smisson breached the standard of care by failing to use
Heparin. Plaintiff’s case also consisted
of the testimony of an economist, her own testimony and the testimony of four
family members and friends of Todd Barrett.
The defense case consisted of four standard of
care expert witnesses, including three neurosurgeons and one
pulmonologist. Defendant’s case also
consisted of his own testimony, the testimony of one of his partners, the
testimony of his nurse, the testimony of five Medical Center employees, including nurses, a certified nurse assistant,
and a physical therapist, and the testimony of the pathologist who did an
autopsy in the case. The jury
deliberated about fifty minutes before returning its verdict.